* On Sep 26 16:24, Ow Mun Heng ([email protected]) wrote:
> Now, I'm wondering how to properly configure Dspam. Dspam seems to work
> well enough but I"m having trouble with dspam not properly
> tagging/recognising SPAM. SPAMassassin seems to do fine.

I was really excited about trying DSPAM, but I had the same result as 
you - it just couldn't tag spam.  I scoured the manuals and mailing 
lists, learned all about the configuration system, but DSPAM just 
couldn't be anywhere near as accurate as Spamassassin.  Spamassassin is a 
bit slower to run, but it just simply does a better job.  I, too, liked 
the CGI interface, but if it's an interface to a failing spam filter, 
what's the point?
Tom

Attachment: pgplz8LZ1RCUg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to