A. Khattri wrote:
I thought so but this begs the question: is there any way of making md
less verbose?
I patched md.c to be somewhat less verbose. Patch attached.
Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- drivers/md/md.c 2005-03-02 08:37:52.000000000 +0100
+++ drivers/md/md.c.quiet 2005-04-20 19:53:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -538,8 +538,10 @@
__u64 ev1, ev2;
mdp_super_t *refsb =
(mdp_super_t*)page_address(refdev->sb_page);
if (!uuid_equal(refsb, sb)) {
+/*
printk(KERN_WARNING "md: %s has different UUID to %s\n",
b, bdevname(refdev->bdev,b2));
+*/
goto abort;
}
if (!sb_equal(refsb, sb)) {
@@ -1035,7 +1037,9 @@
list_add(&rdev->same_set, &mddev->disks);
rdev->mddev = mddev;
+/*
printk(KERN_INFO "md: bind<%s>\n", bdevname(rdev->bdev,b));
+*/
return 0;
}
@@ -1767,8 +1771,10 @@
MD_BUG();
return;
}
-
+
+/*
printk(KERN_INFO "md: running: ");
+*/
ITERATE_RDEV(mddev,rdev,tmp) {
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
@@ -1803,18 +1809,24 @@
mddev_t *mddev;
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
+/*
printk(KERN_INFO "md: autorun ...\n");
+*/
while (!list_empty(&pending_raid_disks)) {
dev_t dev;
rdev0 = list_entry(pending_raid_disks.next,
mdk_rdev_t, same_set);
+/*
printk(KERN_INFO "md: considering %s ...\n",
bdevname(rdev0->bdev,b));
+*/
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&candidates);
ITERATE_RDEV_PENDING(rdev,tmp)
if (super_90_load(rdev, rdev0, 0) >= 0) {
+/*
printk(KERN_INFO "md: adding %s ...\n",
bdevname(rdev->bdev,b));
+*/
list_move(&rdev->same_set, &candidates);
}
@@ -1851,7 +1863,9 @@
mdname(mddev), bdevname(rdev0->bdev,b));
mddev_unlock(mddev);
} else {
+/*
printk(KERN_INFO "md: created %s\n", mdname(mddev));
+*/
ITERATE_RDEV_GENERIC(candidates,rdev,tmp) {
list_del_init(&rdev->same_set);
if (bind_rdev_to_array(rdev, mddev))
