-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Benjamin Smee (strerror) wrote: > heya, > > On Tuesday 17 January 2006 13:12, PaweB Madej wrote: > > Thats a very open question. Try specifying how the users are going to change > their passwords and what type of authentication you are using. On the > assumption that you are talking about authentication using PAM, try reading > the man pages on pam_cracklib. Something like: > password required pam_cracklib.so difok=3 minlength=10 dcredit=2 > ocredit=2 > > in your /etc/pam.d/system-auth should do the trick. >
At this moment I use standard autentication. I already don't have any plan of changing passwords, but want implement some good solution. Already user can manage its passwords via passwd command. Is PAM secure thing? Because I heard very different opinions about it, once that it is great, once that it could make big security hole. - -- Paweł Madej aka Nysander Member of QuanTeam | RLU #357047 http://wiki.quanteam.info | Gentoo Linux User http://forum-farmaceutyczne.org | GPG key: 5861680B | keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu Kielce, Poland | UTF-8 Email Preferred Looking to buy: 6x 73 GB UW3/Ultra160 SCSI 80 pin (SCA) ..::||::.. pair of PentiumIII Slot1 1GHz/ FSB 100 processors ..::||::.. 2x 256 MB SDRAM ECC Registered Got any of this mail me, with prize and shipping costs. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDzP6JgvSMglhhaAsRArN8AKC1px3sigDJw76tbm8MypxsQJPcGwCfY0Ur uKdGput3euUqXvdhIdqtjBw= =oJrK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
