Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote:

> I am not against removing the USE-flag as long as apache-2.0 is masked
> out, but I highly doubt this is what anybody wants, as it becomes even
> more complicated to now use apache-2.0.
> 
> Also, if apache-2.0 is masked, many of the add-on modules would need to
> be masked out as well. It becomes a nightmare to manage all this (trust
> me, I've been there, being the apache maintainer!)

I am in no way suggesting that apache-2.0 should be masked!

What I am suggesting is that anyone who installs a server needs to know what
the heck they are doing, and set up their own system for apache1 -vs-
apache2 (or lighthttpd or zope or aolserver or whatever) _after_ the
initial system install. 

Call me a purist, non system packages don't belong in the system profile,
and in cases such as this the administrator should be making the choices,
not the system profile.

I would rather see stacked profiles:

server
server/apache1
server/apache2

etc...  With the "server" profile being a bare bones system profile.

But anything would be better than the current bizarro desktop profile, chock
full of crap.

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to