José González Gómez schrieb: > > > 2006/9/6, Christian Spoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Tomek Lutelmowski schrieb: > > I think this is very good idea, even more, I think Gentoo should > have error > > reporting tool (let say qreport) which sends information like: > > > > - ebuild version > > - type of bug (compiling, stability, security, etc) > > - emerge --info > > - user comments > > > > to whatever.gentoo.org <http://whatever.gentoo.org>, which then > aggregates such data by ebuilds, platforms > > and bug types. People should be encouraged to use this tool > whetever possible > > (for ex. after emerge errors). I think such tool will colect data > much faster > > and reliable than wiki. > > IMHO, Bugzilla was introduced for this purpose. Why create another > system? You would have to maintain two independent databases. > > > Because bugzilla is thought to report *negative* experiences, but not > *positive* experiences.
Bugzilla isn't only used to report just bugs. It is also used to publish new ebuilds which isn't a very *negative* experience I think. Nevertheless concerning the "error reporting tool" you want I'd stay with Bugzilla because it's already well-known and is tried and tested. Considering your proposal for a system for publishing positive experiences I think a wiki-like thing is enough. You could make a tabular listing of the package version, the version of gcc and the architecture and make the output of emerge --info and possibly some other information available using a popup. Just for keeping things readable.
begin:vcard fn:Christian Spoo n:Spoo;Christian adr;quoted-printable:;;Am Kaiser 26;W=C3=BCrselen;NRW;52146;Deutschland email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;fax:02405/475071 tel;home:02405/493466 tel;cell:0176/61055475 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
