kashani wrote:
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
kashani wrote:
I agree with you. Other then turning on ldap globally, which
annoyed me, I saw no difference from straight 2006.1 at least with my
normal USE flags.
Is your USE="-ldap" broken? :P You can't satisfy everyone. The profile
does nothing more than give people a more server-oriented set of
default USE.
Heh. In my mind this is reason we haven't seen much progress on the
server front. Some people imagine a server profile to be the minimum USE
flags needed to have a working system to which they can add their own
flags. Others want something that has made some decisions for them or at
least a recommended set of flags that will enable server functionality.
Apparently I'm in that first category or I've just been doing it too
Well, lowest common denominator would be an idea. On servers, I always
do -* anyway, so profiles that change a few use-flags don't really
matter at all to me anyway.
I also see the point that this is not that doable, as there are probably
quite a few who do not use pam at all (which I on the other hand do).
But why would, by default, X be activated? (Also a few others, but I
think that X is the best example of "too much")
Greetings,
Jonas
--
[email protected] mailing list
