> Assuming drives are $100 then it's the difference of $300 vs $400 which > is a much better ratio than the shelf example. At this level going with > better performance for that cost difference makes sense.
I totally agree since the 500GB are enough capacity to save at least the work of half a year. Older things are backed up and removed from the server. A whole rack would be real overkill, at least for us.
begin:vcard fn:Christian Spoo n:Spoo;Christian adr;quoted-printable:;;Am Kaiser 26;W=C3=BCrselen;NRW;52146;Deutschland email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;fax:02405/475071 tel;home:02405/493466 tel;cell:0176/61055475 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
