Hi!
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:12:51AM +0100, Christian Bricart wrote:
> > Can anybody in _this_ maillist confirm importance of "remote /usr" support?
> quoting from http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY
AFAIK "remote /usr" idea was born many years ago, when hard drive sizes
was too small. Nowadays this has no sense anymore.
And from management/administration view sharing /usr between many servers
isn't significantly help because most complexity in administration is
updating /etc, not /usr.
Probably I miss something important but I've no idea how "remote /usr" can
make administration easier nowadays...
--
WBR, Alex.
--
[email protected] mailing list
