On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:06 -0500, Charles Duffy wrote: > Wendall Cada wrote: > > I very much agree with his assessment here. This is what I do for binary > > distribution to desktop systems. It is very effective. I have played > > with Catalyst quite a bit, but agree that catalyst-2 is much more well > > suited for this. > > I'm sorry; which "this" are you referring to? I'm a little unclear on > whether what you're indicating that you use is Ramon's suggestion (of > using catalyst-2) or our senior sysadmin's suggestion (of using emerge, > set to output binary packages and target a chroot).
I use (of using emerge, set to output binary packages and target a
chroot) right now, as Ramon's senior sysadmin recommends. But am looking
into using catalyst-2 in the future.
Wendall
>
> Thank you!
>
--
Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
-- Linus Torvalds
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
