I have also been dealing with this. There aren't any gfs2 tools in portage yet, and as I'm doing a new install I didn't want to go with an "old" gfs, especially since the kernel module doesn't work with newer kernels anymore. I ended up writing my own ebuilds. Have a look at these links below for more info. The offsite link in the forum post is more up to date (better init scripts). If you're upgrading from gfs please let me know how that goes with the new ebuilds. I think they should work just fine, but I haven't tested it yet.
Thanks, Brian http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184850 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4732772.html#4732772 https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/bpkroth/web/gentoo/fs-cluster-ebuilds/fs-cluster_ebuilds.tar.bz2 BTW, I long time ago I posted a question regarding OCFS2 vs. GFS2. In my research I decided OCFS2 didn't have all the features I wanted (quotas, acls, cluster flock, etc.) but I did run some simple benchmarks of how they respond with multiple clients. Basically just "iozone -a" on 5 machines at once. Here's another link in case anyone's interested. Sorry for the format, but I had a student make them "pretty" and he used MS Excel 2007. https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/bpkroth/web/fs-cluster/fs-cluster-iozone-results.xls "Todd M. Hébert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello all, > I'm hoping someone has dealt with this by now. > > The kernel seems only to support GFS2, but the user-space tools seem to only > support GFS (GFS1?) > > So.. I am able to format GFS filesystems in userspace, but I cannot mount > them because the kernel doesn't understand them. (and the separate GFS kernel > module will not compile,.. maybe because the one in the kernel source that > handles GFS2 uses some of the same necessary bits?) > > I need to find a way to get either GFS or GFS2 working properly. (I'd think > GFS2 would be preferable.) > > I'm using the 2007.0 profile, and I already have the cluster elements > configured, and only need to format & mount the filesystems at this point. > > Can anyone point me to a resource that will help me get this last bit sorted? > > Thanks, > > --Todd > > (P.S. Pardon anything below this line.. it is required under Irish law. --TMH) > > ********************************************************************** > "Private Confidential & Privileged" > This Email and any files and attachments transmitted with it are > confidential and/or privileged. They are intended solely for > the use of the intended recipient. Any views and opinions expressed > are those of the individual author/sender and are not necessarily > shared or endorsed by Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited or any > associated or related company. The content of this Email and any file > or attachment transmitted with it may have been changed or altered > without the consent of the author. If you are not the intended > recipient, please note that any review, dissemination, disclosure, > alteration, printing, circulation or transmission of this Email and/or > any file or attachment transmitted with it, is prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this Email or any file attachment > transmitted with it in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or contact > Systems Administrator Tel: +353 (1) 411 2244 > Internet Interaction Limited > 3050 Lake Drive, Citywest digital Park, Co Dublin > CRO # 247783 > > > -- > [email protected] mailing list >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
