We are not doing bridging, no. I'd contemplate that the issues are with 32bit interfaces not existing for it though. A solution would be to use a 64 bit static brctl binary. I'll see if I still have a 64 bit userland around.
Josh NADASI Peter wrote: >>We see the same problems with the V240 (same board, different case). Dave >>Miller >>(the linux sparc kernel maintainer) does not have access to a similar box, so >>at >>this point, Send Patches. We are having good luck with 2.4.32 except for a few >>minor issues. > > and can you make ethernet bridging with 2.4.3x ? > i compiled my kernel with the bridge support, downloaded the > bridge-utils v1.0.6 and it requires the 2.6.x series kernel headers :((( > since bridge-utils 1.x the 2.6.x kernel is needed... i think. > older 0.9.7 versions are compiled fine but i get this message: > > #./brctl addbr bri > Get bridge indices failed: Operation not supported > can't setup bridge control: Operation not supported > > if I compile it in module, i get the same :( > > has anyone experience using bridge in 2.4.x? > Peter > > >>>I'm running a SUN v210 with 2.4.32 fine but I have to make an ethernet >>>bridge and bridge-utils requires 2.6.x >>>I have compiled a lot of 2.6.x kernels, with udev, with devfs, etc.. but >>>everytime if the 2.6.x is booting, it freezes at: >>> >>>VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. >>> >>>I don't see the usual INIT message, it doesn't start the boot runlevel. >>>It freezes very serious, I can reboot it only after a power-off. >>> >>>But if I boot with the 2.4.32 then it works pretty well!!! >>> >>>Have you met this problem earlier? >>>Any hints, ideas are welcome! >>>Best Regards, >>>Peter >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
