Ferris, I might be able to help. I have a SunBlade 100 with the ATI Rage XL chip. If I remember correctly, this uses the mach64 drivers in xorg-7.x (6.8.x used ati). However, I am a couple days away from even getting through the modular migration. Right now I am stuck on getting mesa-6.5 compiled.
-Chris -----Original Message----- From: Ferris McCormick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:50 PM To: Gentoo Sparc Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gentoo-sparc] [Fwd: [Bug 3914] ATI Mach64 locks up sparc post 6.8.99.3] Is anyone in a position to verify this? It's basically a proposed one-line fix for the sparc/mach64 lockup problem with xorg-x11-7.1, and if it works, it's better than remove-altix. The actual proposed patch looks like ======================== --- hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/linuxPci.c- 2006-08-24 18:32:52.000000000 +0000 +++ hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/linuxPci.c 2006-08-24 18:37:10.000000000 +0000 @@ -84,7 +84,11 @@ /* pciAddrBusToHost */ linuxPpcBusAddrToHostAddr, #else /* pciAddrHostToBus */ pciAddrNOOP, +#ifdef __ia64__ /* pciAddrBusToHost */ linuxTransAddrBusToHost, +#else +/* pciAddrBusToHost */ pciAddrNOOP, +#endif #endif /* pciControlBridge */ NULL, =========================== I have attached it as jparnes.patch, as well. I have verified that the patch installs, and that linuxPci.c compiles with it applied, but I do not have a mach64 system on which to test it. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 3914] ATI Mach64 locks up sparc post 6.8.99.3 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3914 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 09:20 ------- The snippet below (from the revert patch) removes the new linuxTransAddrBusToHost routine from the PCI mapping function table. This routine is *supposed* to be generic, but it may well be broken on some sparc64 configurations. Can you try building a tree without the revert patch but with that line protected #if defined(__ia64__) ... #endif instead of removed entirely? That would tell us for sure if the xf86GetOSOffsetFromPCI routine was the culprit (it probably is, it has quite a few shortcomings). If that works, simply protecting that line with an #ifdef __ia64__ might be a good short term fix... Thanks, Jesse --- a/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/linuxPci.c +++ b/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/linuxPci.c @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ #include "Pci.h" static CARD32 linuxPciCfgRead(PCITAG tag, int off); static void linuxPciCfgWrite(PCITAG, int off, CARD32 val); static void linuxPciCfgSetBits(PCITAG tag, int off, CARD32 mask, CARD32 bits); -static ADDRESS linuxTransAddrBusToHost(PCITAG tag, PciAddrType type, ADDRESS addr); #if defined(__powerpc__) static ADDRESS linuxPpcBusAddrToHostAddr(PCITAG, PciAddrType, ADDRESS); static ADDRESS linuxPpcHostAddrToBusAddr(PCITAG, PciAddrType, ADDRESS); @@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ #if defined(__powerpc__) /* pciAddrBusToHost */ linuxPpcBusAddrToHostAddr, #else /* pciAddrHostToBus */ pciAddrNOOP, -/* pciAddrBusToHost */ linuxTransAddrBusToHost, +/* pciAddrBusToHost */ pciAddrNOOP, #endif /* pciControlBridge */ NULL, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ================================================= Thanks, Ferris -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc) -- [email protected] mailing list
