I been away for several days... But unmerge and the re-emerge of mozilla
followed by emerge of galeon did the trick... now to put back the the
new gcc (3.2.1) as the default... 

I give that this is this way, should a default gentoo system be built
with both gcc compilers?  and should not the correct gcc be a required
of the ebuilds for mozilla and galeon? .. .at least until they work with
the new gcc?

Thanks,


Lincoln



On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 04:04, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 03 February 2003 05:53, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
> > mozilla compiles this way... and it WORKS! with netscape-flash (no
> > crash. yea!)...
> >
> > But, galeon emerge now fails. the first signs of trouble are:
> >
> >         checking X11/extensions/Xinerama.h presence... yes
> >         configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xinerama.h: present but
> >         cannot be compiled
> >         configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xinerama.h: check for missing
> >         prerequisite headers?
> >         configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xinerama.h: proceeding with
> >         the preprocessor's result
> >         checking for X11/extensions/Xinerama.h... yes
> >
> > It goes on to compile a bunch of modules and ends with
> 
> Check the config.log file in the compile directory for why Xinerama fails.
> 
> > find.o: file not recognized: File truncated
> 
> Try to check your log for other references to find.o as the error should be 
> somewhere above.
> 
> > Now that mozilla IS working with netscape-flash should I put gcc back to
> > 3.2.1 to compile galeon?  or did something else get foobared in the
> > process.  Perhaps I should try to unmerge mozilla and re emerge it... it
> > did complain at the end about about unmerging the old version, some
> > thing about old headers, but it was the same version as before, so I did
> > not know what to make of it.
> >
> > Boy it really would be nice if there were a set of instructions like the
> > install guide, which is excellent...
> 
> Yes, if things fail, first unmerge the old version of mozilla.
> 
> Good luck,
> Paul
-- 
Lincoln A. Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to