Alrighty then; I'll experiment with it and post my results.

> Unfortunately, I'm not sure about this, as I have never used kernel
> module autoloading :-\ good luck! :)
>
> (My understanding is that this means that MANY module needs can be
> automatically detected and loaded and unlaoded as needed in this manner,
> but I'm not real clear on it)
>
> --Brandon
>
> On Thu, 03/06/03 at 14:12:53 -0800, Doug Gorley wrote:
>> Thanks; one more question before I go experiment.  If I've got
>>
>>     CONFIG_KMOD=y
>>
>> in my .config file after configuring my kernel, how do I take
>> advantage of it?  Documentation/kmod.txt says to use the following
>> command to set the path to modprobe:
>>
>>     echo "/sbin/modprobe" > /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe
>>
>> and the following crontab entry to remove unused modules.
>>
>>     0-59/5 * * * * /sbin/rmmod -a
>>
>> If I do this, do I still need to list my modules in
>> /etc/modules.autoload, or will kmod handle everything correctly?
>>
>> > Yeah, quite correct... been a while since I did two different
>> .configs same source that I wanted to use.. :)
>> >
>> > --B
>> >
>> > On Thu, 03/06/03 at 13:38:34 -0800, Doug Gorley wrote:
>> >> Thanks for your reply.
>> >>
>> >> So, not only is this OK, but it's a good idea if I want to
>> experiment with different kernels from the same source, yes?
>> Otherwise, if I compiled two kernels from the vanilla-sources,
>> wouldn't the modules from the second clobber those from the first?
>> >>
>> >> > The kernel 'knows' it's name, and all packages that install
>> kernel
>> >> modules also look at the same version that the kernel in
>> >> /usr/src/linux knows (/usr/src/linux/include/version.h (or
>> something of the sort)), so changing the name and recompiling works
>> just fine and dandy.
>> >> >
>> >> > --Brandon
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, 03/06/03 at 13:16:43 -0800, Doug Gorley wrote:
>> >> >> Good afternoon (PST) list,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm trying to get a little more comfortable with kernel
>> >> configuration, and have just compiled a 2.4.20 kernel from the
>> vanilla-sources that uses modules wherever possible.  Following the
>> Kernel HOWTO at http://www.tldp.org/, I changed my Makefile to read
>> >> >>
>> >> >> EXTRAVERSION = -Carnage_2003-03-06
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Now, what I've noticed is that in /lib/modules, I now have
>> separate
>> >> directories called 2.4.20 and 2.4.20-Carnage_2003-03-06.  Will the
>> new kernel automatically know that it's modules are in the
>> >> directory bearing it's name, or do I now have to somehow tell my
>> kernel where to look?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Doug Gorley | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Doug Gorley | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>>
>>
>> --
>> Doug Gorley | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


-- 
Doug Gorley | [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to