On Friday 14 March 2003 13:26, Alex Walker wrote: > On Friday 14 March 2003 12:05, Lloyd H. Meinholz wrote: > > I have the same issue, I'm just ignoring the upgrade portage message for > > now, but it's disconcerting. I'm very good about keeping my config files > > updated... > > I think this was a bug in portage. It looks like it's been fixed in -r10: > > 12 Mar 2003; Nicholas Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> emerge: Added more > conditions on rsync -- Proper error detection. Rsync failures will not > cause a cache regeneration. Portage no longer considers masked portages > candidates for 'An update to portage'. > > That last bit seems about right...
You are right, this is/was a confirmed bug. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
