Let us try to stop this before it gets into a flamewar. Next thing we know, people are going to say that emacs is better than vi ;-)
Bram > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Tegtmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 5 juni 2003 11:45 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Postfix vs. Qmail > > > Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Never used qmail, but I've heard the author/license/etc is a > > bit..odd.. > > If you never tried qmail you may have read nothing from the > author. If this is the case why do you spread this nonsense then? > > The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always comes down to > the point where someone says that either the qmail license or > Bernstein sucks. But personal feelings or FUD feeded > knowledge are not the base to choose an MTA. > > For technical reasons both are a good choice. There are some > cases where Postfix might be better and there are some where > qmail wins. Both are supported well through their communities > and commercial support is available too for both. > > Everyone who has to make the decision should create a list of > criteria that has to be met. Then the software can be checked > in test installations against his list. > > Regards, Frank > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
