On Tuesday 03 June 2003 07:00 pm, Michael Rasile wrote: > On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 10:53:02PM -0400 or thereabouts, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > > Hmm, what does scanimage -L do? I know you said but I've > > forgotten. If scanimage -L doesn't find it then xsane won't > > either. In my case scanimage -L found it and so did xsane. Xsane > > is essentially a GUI equivalent of scanimage. > > > > I'd recommend going to man sane-usb and checking the man pages > > found in the see also section as well as man sane. That's what I > > did. > > > > > On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 09:41:36PM -0400 or thereabouts, Brett I. > > > Holcomb > > > > wrote: > > > > Did you check man sane-usb? I have a scsi scanner but had to > > > > set up some config files. > > > > > > Hello, > > > Thanks for the tip. I read the man on sane-usb and made some > > > changes, but no go. I'm beginning to hate xsane. > > > sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, why the hell won't xsane > > > find the scanner. These are the questions I ask myself and others > > > when I am frustrated. :-)) Thanks again. > > > > > > Mike > > > > -- > > > > Brett I. Holcomb > > AKA Grunt <>< > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > Well, scanimage -L does not find the scanner. I just don't understand > this, the scanner is there in the kernel. Everything seems to be in > place, but it will not find the device. I did check man sane-usb I'll > recheck man sane, but I haven't a clue. Why is sane-find-scanner > finding the scanner device, but xsane won't. Well, thanks for taking > the time to reply. I shall forge on! :-)) > > Mike
Scanners can be a big problem... My advice would be, at least temporarily, is to join the sane mailing list. They are a helpful bunch that KNOW scanners. http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel -- Regards, Ernie 100% Microsoft and Intel free -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
