In fact, rhythmbox proper is supposed to have better library support. On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:24, Shane Hickey wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:42:26 +0200 > Patrick Marquetecken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I tried rhythmbox and had no luck with it, but there is also > > net-rhythmbox and that works great (its the same). If i'm right > > rhythmbox is dead, or almost. You can find it at: > > http://web.verbum.org/net-rhythmbox/ > > Hmm... from what I read there, net-rhythmbox is indeed a fork off of > rhythmbox, but it seems that they are merging net-rhythmbox into > rhythmbox-cvs. That's what I'm running. Ah well, I'll try a re-emerge.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
