begin  quote
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:05:42 -0400
Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Friday 27 June 2003 09:49 am, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> > It is clear there is more to this than Gentoo is letting on ... or
> > there wouldn't be a reorg going on
> 
> 
> The way I see it, reorganization is needed to separate Gentoo the
> distro from Gentoo Games and perhaps a future Gentoo Embedded.
> Daniel has promised an explanation at some vague point in the future. 
> See:
> http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=3892&offset=45&rows=48#115886
> 

-dev stepping in into the ashes.

Actually the reorg has been needed since _at least_ april, but before
this there was no incentive to do so since there wasn't anything burning
in the open. you could feel the heat in some places and there were signs
of smoke, but nothing serious. 

Currently we have noone who is responsible for anything, theres seemant
to yell at when theres devstuff, Zhen when theres docstuff and drobbins
for the rest.  foser, Me, liquidx when its gtk+ ...  dan when its KDE..
but nothing has been documented, no chain of command and noone who
really says "go do this, its needed" .

We have been completely chaotic in structure, where noone "in charge"
over small parttime projects and things generally running out of time. 
The only time you've gotten an update on whats going on is when somone
finds a nifty new feature, or when you go hunting whoever it was that
broke that thing over there....

There's been talk of herds and some work is going into that (read back,
this was well before the whining around the fork)  and hopefully
management ties into this nicely.


as for the fork,    Buisness as usual. The most interesting  thing that
I see coming out of this is that they do some infrastructure changes
that might scale nicer than what we have.. but that's yet to see.


//Spider
 -- Irate developer


-- 
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to