From research I've done it appears MySQL does things that
are non-standard for SQL or the ANSI specs.
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:19:03 -0600
Mike Roest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mysql with a InnoDB table backend is much better in those
respects. It enforces foreign key constraints, has a
transaction log so if the server
dies in the middle of a transaction it can rollback or
forward. Quite
nice actually, it is a little more of a pain to setup as
there are some additional my.cnf directives that need to
be added. Compiling the support in is pretty easy
USE="innodb" emerge mysql.
brett holcomb wrote:
Thanks. I had considered MySQL but it doesn't have (at
the last time I
checked) some of the features of databases like DB2,
Sybase, etc. in the
area of data integrity, etc. I want to have the features
of those
databases.
On 03 Jul 2003 09:07:24 -0500
"Kevin S. Dome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really like MySQL,it is especially made wasy with
phpMyAdmin, which
will also show you the SQL syntax as well as making
administration
easier.
kevin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
