On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:07:08 +0200 Thorsten Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ian Truelsen (2003-07-13 13:23 +0200) > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:55:30 +0100 > > Dhruba Bandopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you inject a stub for qmail there is no reason why ssmtp should > >be > blocked too. Stubs are only good for the package which you > >specified > and no others. > > > However, my understanding is that ssmtp would not be installed if > > qmail was actually there, as it would satisfy the virtual/mta > > dependency. Therefore, if the system thinks that qmail is installed, > > then ssmtp would not be installed. > > Correct, it would be shown as "blocked"... > I guess my question then is: why is it not doing that? Any thoughts on what might be wrong? -- Ian Truelsen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: ihtruelsen Homepage: http://www.ihtruelsen.dyndns.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
