On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:22:06PM +0200, Terje Kvernes wrote:
>   ordered a dual 1.8Ghz Opteron to do numbercrunching.  we've also
>   bought a dual 3.06Ghz P4 Xeon with HyperThreading to compare it
>   with, but there is very little doubt that the Opteron will come out
>   first.

I wouldn't make that assumption. I could very easily see the dual Xeon
outperforming the dual Opteron -- make sure to test the specific application
first. In fact, I would wager that the dual Xeon will outperform the Opteron
in most situations, based on my experience. The Opteron 240 seems to be
performing somewhere between an XP 2000+ and XP 2200+; not even up to Athlon
MP levels yet -- based on my testing, which is by no means exhaustive. And
hyperthreading can make a very significant difference for many types of
loads, too.

Be sure to benchmark what you are actually going to be using the machine
for. A lot of us work under the assumption that "64-bit is faster," and
that's not necessarily true.

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins
Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to