-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 23 July 2003 04:29, Donny Davies wrote: > Chuckle. Tell that to the people running 10,000 user setups on SAMBA with > nothing but praise and admiration for the software. You could search
Yes, for that setup you most likely can afford to pay someone to make it work as intended instead of leaving it to whoever knows most about linux at the office ;) Anyway, samba doesn't perform well with many users attached to large directories, as the dir rescan costs. I can however imagine that in a 10k user setup with a lot of shares (logon, homedirs) with limited contents, decent hardware would help samba perform quite well. For my setup it just didn't ;) - --Erik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Hksgds9m9uhAobARAjVMAJ41a7OTQYCriqqpk+dTlmvWyQJycwCfdLQN 2Ok6SFOC8g0G7chNtWv8LTQ= =IdOP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
