Just one little question: WHY do you want to do this???
From my personal experience: ext3 is _much_ better than reiserfs!
Its backward compatible, so you can easily fix it with ext2-tools, which isn't the case with reiserfs and which is the reason why I switched from reiserfs to ext3 as my reiserfs had faults no one could repair...
Hi Arnold,
full ACK with what you've mentioned about rescue system and such, but in my case I'm using 2.4 rescue disks only which happen to have reiserfs support (i.e. Knoppix). Also I found that reiserfs performs much better than ext3 on the computers where I've tried it. And performance is one of my top concerns for everyday use on my laptop.
So I'd like to give reiserfs a try on the laptop, too. Best regards,
- Christian
--
Christian Aust mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 84500990 - Yahoo!: datenimperator - MSN: datenimperator PGP: A073 F9CD 2F23 25D2 EB95 E7A3 B9B4 2AF3 E103 DB5A
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
