Well, I guess it just depends on your configuration. I have had nothing but good things come from it..
Sorry it didn't work for you.. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Spider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Normal applications under OpenMosix? begin quote On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:08:58 -0500 "Jeffrey Smelser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what was your cluster made up of?? What was your -j option in > make.conf? Back then only three machines, one XP 1800, a tbird 1.1 Ghz and a celeron 300. jobs migrated from all machines (nice and well when encoding .mp3 and .ogg ) but make/gcc didn't handle it that well, at one time I did the make -j ; in the kernel tree, and while jobs migrated, it wasn't that very efficient. I think for portage I used MAKEOPTS="-j12" to get migration... //Spider > > -----Original Message----- > From: Spider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Normal applications under OpenMosix? > > > begin quote > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:17 -0500 > "Jeffrey Smelser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess I get different results here. My compiles migrate all the > > time.. I do remember the early versions of the software not > > migrating to often unless you basically forced the damn thing, but > > its come a long way recently... > > > > When was the last time you used it spider? > > > > Early this spring (feb or so) > > //Spider > > -- > begin .signature > This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! > See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. > end > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
