Excellent, Karl. In fact it's really none of our business what model Gentoo chooses.
> On Freitag, 15. August 2003 00:35, ueberlamer wrote: > > On Thursday 14 August 2003 23:13, Tom Wesley wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Not sure if this should be here, or -devel, so I post here to not > > > annoy too many people. > > > > > > Does Gentoo publish it's donation incomes anywhere? > > > > A disclosure of donation data would really appease that negative > > impression I have of gentoo's business plans and concept recently. > > My scepticism started when I heard about the zynot fork episode. > > Having heard and read about this issue too I just want to express that > for me personally all this does not count: I don't care about the > business model, but only about the quality of Gentoo. > > As long as it is good like today (or better :-)) I will use it - no > matter if it costs money or not. > > If somebody might become rich due to making/selling/supporting > Gentoo, that's no problem for me - but if Gentoo would not be > a good distro anymore ( good == usable for my purposes ) - THAT > would be a problem for me. > > For the moment I am happy and thankful about getting such a fine > distribution for free, but i would not mind paying for it: I have > to pay for lots of other things that are miles away from this > level of usefulness - e.g. each month the German state takes away > a considerable part of my money to build even more highways and > strange stuff like that... > > But (of course) that's just my personal opinion and everybody > is absolutely free to have a different one. :-)) > > Karl-Heinz -- Brett I. Holcomb AKA Grunt <>< -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
