Jason Stubbs wrote: > If you want only one service, why not use ftp? W2K has a pretty > interface for ftp that looks the same as explorer. Linux clients will > get all the correct permissions and such. That would be my suggestion > if you need to mix the two.
Don't count on Windows to make this easy. Sure, W2K *now* has ftp. But don't forget that NT came out with FTP *only* on the servers, not on the "pro" version (read: desktop). You had to be hooked to an WinNT server to perform FTP transfers. Ain't that sweet! There is no guarantee that Win2003 in the non-server version will have ftp. And you *will* have to upgrade. Bet on it. In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord, Tom :-}) Thomas A. Condon Barbershop Bass Singer Registered Linux User #154358 Interfere not in the business of Dragons, For you are crunchy when flamed and taste good. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
