On Wednesday 03 September 2003 04:13 pm, Thomas Schneider wrote: > but afaik you need masquerading for the outgoing packets 'cause they > would have the internal address, if you don't masquerade them? did i > understand this in a wrong way?
you need masq if you want lan boxes to see the net, but dnat-ing telnet shouldn't need masq to route packets back. -- mathieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
