On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 20:16, dave! wrote: > The person who said the patch was only in gentoo-sources was right, > vanilla sources wont be patched for it, enhancement requests for vanilla > sources wont get a moments thought. If you really want it built with for > athlon-xp choose Athlon/Duron/K7 in menuconfig and > > sed s:\-march=athlon:\-march=athlon-xp:g -i arch/i386/Makefile >
That's cool, but I won't bother. I was just curious the other day about running a 2.4.22 kernel as I'm on 2.4.20-r7. I looked around and there appeared to be six 2.4.22 kernels I could run: aa-sources 2.4.22r1 ac-sources 2.4.22r1 grsec-sources 2.4.22.1.9.12 gs-sources 2.4.22_pre2 openmosix-sources 2.4.22 vanilla-sources 2.4.22 vanilla-sources sounded the most benign , so I grabbed it and ran across this observation about the Athlon AP. If they don't want to modify vanilla-sources (to keep it 'vanilla') then that's fine. I looked around and didn't spot any discussion of which one of these I might want to run or why I'd choose ac-sources vs. gs-sources. Is there a description somewhere of why all 6 are offered? Has there been any discussion here or in the forums somewhere? Thanks again, Mark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
