On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:29:00AM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Steve writes:
> 
> > Anyone run into this:
> 
> > make: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
> 
> > !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r2 failed.
> > !!! Function src_compile, Line 371, Exitcode 2
> > !!! (no error message)
> 
> > when trying to emerge the latest stable gcc?
> 
> Just compiled it without problems. Are there no more messages before  
> these, showing some more errors? Maybe you overlooked them in the  
> bunch of ouputput log?
> 
> Are you using very aggressive CFLAGS?
> 
Same error...  

My CFLAGS:
 
  CFLAGS="-mcpu=athlon-tbird -O2 -pipe"
  CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"

Here is a dump from emerge:

..
ific.o .libs/libgcj.lax/libgcjgc_convenience.a/stubborn.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libgcjgc_convenience.a/typd_mlc.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libgcjgc_convenience.a/backgraph.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libgcjgc_convenience.a/win32_threads.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libgcjgc_convenience.a/mach_dep.o  
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/debug.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/prep_cif.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/types.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/raw_api.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/java_raw_api.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/ffi.o 
.libs/libgcj.lax/libffi_convenience.a/sysv.o  .libs/libgcj.lax/libltdlc.a/ltdl.o
ar: .libs/libgcj.a: Is a directory
make[3]: *** [libgcj.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.2.3-r2/work/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.2.3-r2/work/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava'
make[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.2.3-r2/work/build'
make: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
 
 !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r2 failed.
 !!! Function src_compile, Line 371, Exitcode 2
 !!! (no error message)
  
  terrapin root #

Also here are the USE flags that are in effect:

[ebuild     U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r2 [3.2.3-r1] -static +nls -bootstrap +java -build

I am guessing maybe to remove +java????

-Jeff Caldwell


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to