On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:14, Bryce wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 2149, in ? > mydepgraph.merge(mydepgraph.altlist()) > File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 1356, in merge > retval=portage.doebuild(y,"merge",myroot,edebug) > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 1821, in doebuild > return > merge(settings["CATEGORY"],settings["PF"],settings["D"],settings["BUILDDIR"] > +"/build-info",myroot,myebuild=settings["EBUILD"]) > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 1940, in merge > return mylink.merge(pkgloc,infloc,myroot,myebuild) > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 5018, in merge > return self.treewalk(mergeroot,myroot,inforoot,myebuild) > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 4708, in treewalk > unlockdir(mytmpdir_lock) > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 5527, in unlockdir > return unlockfile(mylock) > File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 5568, in unlockfile > lockfilename,myfd,unlinkfile = mytuple > TypeError: unpack non-sequence > > this happens in the last little bit of an emerge crack-attack. It doesn't seem > to be an important problem, but one that should be looked into.
Yep. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30613
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
