I just injected the apmd package, cause I rely on ACPI in my kernel. Its not proper I know.
Enjoy On Thursday 09 October 2003 04:21, momesana wrote: > My own quick and dirty workaround for this problem: > set the /usr/src/linux symlink to a 2.4.x kernel and merge apdm-3.0.2-r3. > Afterwards you can immediately set back the /usr/src/linux symlink to your > 2.4.6 kernel. > The problems did occur since the new kernel API breaks compatibility with > the old kernel-module style. The apmd modules are provided in the old > kernel module style that is indicated by the *.o suffix as opposed to the > new *.ko suffix. > > Good luck > .. > > Am Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2003 04:00 schrieb momesana: > > Hi everybody, > > I have recently switched to the test kernel 2.6.0-test6 and now when > > trying to emerge -u world > > I receive following error-message: > > > > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:451: for each function it appears > > in.) /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h: In function > > `bit_spin_is_locked': /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:462: > > invalid type argument of `->' apmsleep.c: In function `main': > > apmsleep.c:120: warning: implicit declaration of function `exit' > > apmsleep.c: At top level: > > apmsleep.c:66: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used > > make: *** [apmsleep.o] Error 1 > > rm apm.o apmd.o > > > > !!! ERROR: sys-apps/apmd-3.0.2-r3 failed. > > !!! Function src_compile, Line 46, Exitcode 2 > > !!! compile problem > > > > Does anybody know a workaround for this. BTW, I didn't enable power > > amangment at all when I compiled the kernel but rather chose acpi. What > > do I need apmd for at all??? > > > > Thanx in advance, momesana > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
