Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yup. I remember your post (was it Ruby list? :-)
That's completely possible. > There is quite some time since I discovered Subversion, but it looks > like overkill for my local needs - many components are needed for > install, while bith darcs & arch are very simple and powerful > replacement for CVS' limits. If you like simplicity of installation, you might want to try arch (dev-util/tla) first, since it's a C program, with a single binary, while darcs is written in Haskell. (Not that it's very hard to install Haskell, just that you wont have to if you decide you like arch). Also, I think arch has a larger user base, which might not mean much to you directly, but it means it's likely that bugs will be discovered and fixed quicker etc. -- Bj�rn Lindstr�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
