Hi,
Thanks for all your kindly response!
Right, it leads me to some question on the slot mechanism.
The slot stuff is nothing but making different version of pkg to coexist
on the system. Then, it there a way to setting the current version to
user? Is there any convention used whenever there are slotted pkgs?
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 20:15, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On 10/27/03 Zarick Lau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just want to know about the status on python 2.3.
> >
> > Does portage is totally ready for python 2.3 and
> > python 2.3 ebuild stable??
>
> We hope that there are no problems left with portage and python-2.3, but
> as there are some incompatibilities between 2.2 and 2.3 and some
> important changes to portage to support python-2.3 it's still masked.
Right, I have check the bug in bugzilla.
BTW, I am quite interested to give it a try, or as long as I can have a
way to recover my system in case crapp.
IMO, if I have a binary pkg of portage and python2.2 (stable),
it should be totally safe for me to try out the the unstable ones, do I
right?
>
> > If the both question is positive, what should I do in order to
> > install python 2.3 on my box?
> > update portage then python 2.3??
>
> wait until it becomes stable.
>
> > how about those python modules??
> > How to make it work with python 2.{2,3}?
>
> After you emerged python-2.3 you're told to run python-updater, that is
> a script that will re-emerge all python modules.
Thanks !
>
> Marius
Zarick Lau
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list