On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 18:36:49 +0000 Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. > > Not a bad idea, I'll keep that idea as a backup plan :) > I'm interested to hear why you think of it as a reserve-only solution. Really, I don't think that it's a bad idea. I just want to wait for more ideas, to see if there is some surprisingly better way :) > That's interesting. I'd find that degree of slowness quite unacceptable > - mine takes a few seconds to synchronise. The way that Apple's > Mail.app (the client I use most all the time) seems to work is that if > I wake the computer from sleep after, say, 24 hours, then it will > syncronise the mail headers in all folders before getting any message > bodies. If I go straight to a folder with 100 new messages, then, I > guess it takes 20 seconds or so to read the first new messages. But > that's the longest it ever seems to take, because Mail.app caches > messages stored on an IMAP server. I just installed sylpheed-claws and found out, that it's _way_ faster when entering folders. But it blocks while checking for new mails. :| So, back to the old question... which mailclient fits best for me... I would really like sylpheed-claws win32, if it would not be so _extremely_ slow :) > Well, I hope you find it useful. Since my mail client allows me to do > searches, that suggestion would work for me. Well, actually, I'd change > it to a bash script that did it for each of my mail-list mailboxes, but > you know what I mean. If you want something else, why not put them in > /home/http/htdocs & run htdig on them..? The ultimate solution, I think, would be an html-archive, something like mailman creates, and then running htdig over that data :) Thanks for the ideas Greetings, Dennis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
