On Monday 03 November 2003 07:13, William Kenworthy wrote: > Also see here for another go which looked a bit better for gentoo, but > brought up a whole lot of factors no-one expected. > > "http://www.linmagau.org/" issue 9 You made a small mistake in your description of CFLAGS with -mfpmath=387,sse. You wrote "use sse if possible, 387 math co-processor instructions if not" but it actually means to use both at the same time to attempt to double the amount of math registers. Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
- [gentoo-user] bad gentoo performance Eric Marchionni
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo perform... Stroller
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo per... William Kenworthy
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo... Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad ge... Bill Kenworthy
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo... Stroller
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad ge... William Kenworthy
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo perform... SN
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo per... Martin LORANG
- RE: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo perform... Van Eps, Nathan D. (James Tower)
- Re: [gentoo-user] bad gentoo per... Peter Ruskin
