On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:26:18 -0500 "Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahha - I'm on 2.4.x series. When 2.6,7, or whatever is stable then I'll go > for that! > > On Tuesday 04 November 2003 15:18, you wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:17:31 -0500 "brett holcomb" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > Do you get any error messages in any logs? > > > > > > Here, alsa has worked like a champ. I build it (and > > > rebuild if I do another kernel). After that I copy my > > > saved alsa file to /etc/modules.d and do the > > > modules-update. Works fine. > > > > Small note. This is 2.6 kernel. There is nothing to rebuild after > > generating a kernel. alsa is now a part of the kernel tree. > Unless you have a very unusual configuration, it's rock solid now. I've been on board since 2.5.x (now 2.6.0_test8) without any glitches - several months. I'm sure this is in part due to the fact that I use plain ole ext3 instead of the more adventuresome filesystems <grin>. Even nvidia has updated their modules. 2.6 is a lot more stable at this point than 2.4 was in its early stages. Getting alsa support to work for my ens1371 has been the only problem, and that is nothing new - never worked on for me on 2.4. Now at least I have a workable (if clumsy) solution. Prior to this on 2.4 and 2.6 I could only get the OSS support for ens1371 to work. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
