> > Grub is working right, you got something else going.. It looks to
> > me like its past grub and booting linux. Linux is trying to find
> > your ide controller cards and locking.. Or something to that affect.
> 
> That's my thought too, but slightly different. hda-hdd are 
> the chipset EIDE
> controllers. It found them, and said it was going to use DMA. 
> I don't know
> if this is good or bad, but that's how I read this. However, 
> I don't know
> the next step:
> 
> 1) Look at the drives attached to the EIDE controllers, or
> 
> 2) Look for the next controller, which is the SATA controller
> 
> I'm sort of guessing that it's the second option, and that 
> possibly the
> initrd has a driver for the SATA controller. However, in my mind this
> afternoon, that seems like a leap to assume that genkernel 
> figured out this
> machine had an SATA controller and then built the driver into 
> the kernel, or
> included it into the initrd file so that the machine would boot.

  I thought of that, but "normally" it would kernel panic out saying it can't find 
your root drive.. (I think you said your sata driver is your primary hd... I am trying 
to remember, but I think it tried to find all the HD's in the system before checking 
the partitions.. I got scsi at home and I can't remember if it looked at my ide, then 
scsi, then checked the partitions...

I would compile it internally, 

> > Wait.......... you have > kernel
> > (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.4.20-gentoo-r8 root=/dev/hde3
> >                         > initrd (hd0,0)/initrd-2.4.20-gentoo-r8
> >
> > why don't you have /boot in front of initrd like you do the kernel??
> >
> > there is no nee
> 
> Did you mean to finish this thought? There's no need? Or no 
> need in some
> cases but it must be there in others?
> 
> Using grub's find is how I even found that genkernel had 
> built an initrd and
> what its name was. It seemed to complete automatically inside 
> of grub, but
> maybe that's not enough during the actual boot process?
> 
> However, if /boot MUST be in front, then I think I didn't try 
> that yet.
> 
> Thanks! I think I'm closer with your help. don't give up on 
> me. I think lots
> of people here are interested in SATA performance numbers. I 
> hope to get
> some...

if your /boot partition is seperate, then the above will work fine.. If grub found it, 
it should work.. and I was gonna say something, no idea what though.. ;)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to