FWIW, a little TOP post on my own post. Seems to be a TOP TOPIC nowadays ;) TOP/HOT Getit??
I've finally figured out the innodb problem. Thanks to everybody who helped. I'm unsubscribing from this list, it really hasn't helped me much and as much as I like to help others, I've been flooded with: 1. SPAM 2. Mails ranting about spam 3. Mails ranting about top-posters 4. Mails ranting about spam and top-posters 5. Mails about TV commercials in the US (lost count of the precise numbers, there are soooo many). Personally, I think this is a load of gobblesmack and the list is full of trollers looking for arguments. Good luck to you all. Call me when you get down to serious stuff. Here's IBM motto for those that are about to send nasty replies: Think! Cheers! > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 December 2003 12:23 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [gentoo-user] Creating mysql tables type=innodb > > > Hi, > > This may seem a little off-topic but I can't seem to get my > hands round this. > > I emerged mysql 4.0.14 with USE=innodb in my make.conf; which > built just fine. > > I created a database and added some tables using type=innodb > and started working with them just fine. Yesterday morning I > noticed the tables were recognised as MyISAM. I tried to > change them (eg: alter table aliases > type=innodb;) and my alter queries run perfectly (no errors) > however the tables still are 'MyISAM'. > > I've even re-emerged mysql (and seen the innodb stuff get > included) but to no avail. The documentation available on the > mysql website does not express any special requirements other > than 4.x version. What am I missing? > > Cheers! > Chris > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
