Sorry, I don't see the big difference between my reply and yours. But then 
again maybe my english is not perfect.

The only thing I tried to point out is that the virtuals are linked to 
real packages in /etc/make.profile/virtuals. If the "real" package is 
masked, then so is the virtual, yielding the error.

I never meant to suggest that the symbolic link should be adapted! I meant 
that you can see which "real" kernel is connected to the virtual, which 
can give you the info on why the emerge fails.

So if you have a masked kernel you could install another one.

So essentially I meant to say the same thing as you did.

Elton




On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Marius Mauch wrote:

> On 12/05/03  Elton Algera wrote:
> 
> > Check the contents of /etc/make.profile/virtuals; e.g.
> > 
> > grep linux-sources /etc/make.profile/virtuals
> > 
> > in my case it gives sys-kernel/gentoo-sources.
> > You can change it, however, by changing profiles (/etc/make.profile
> > symb. link)
> > 
> > If this grep yields somethings else that's only masked then that's the
> > trouble...
> 
> Sorry, don't want to be rude but I have to say this:
> Please don't give advise if you don't know what you're talking about.
> What you suggested is complete nonsense and can be very dangerous. 
> 
> That said, the original problem is likely caused by ac-sources or
> gaming-sources. 
> ac-sources is unmaintained upstream and therefore masked in
> package.mask. If you really want to continue to use it you can unmask
> them in /etc/portage/package.unmask, but I recommend that you switch to
> another kernel package as there won't be new versions or fixes for
> ac-sources.
> There was an issue with gaming-sources a few days ago, don't really know
> what caused it, it seems to work fine now (if you use
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"). If not run `emerge --sync` and try again.
> 
> Marius
> 
> -- 
> Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
> 
> In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
> Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
> 


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to