On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 19:44, brett holcomb wrote: > I've used NFS on a VMS/Windows situation a long time ago > and it worked well there. I was planning to do NFS but > was wondering what OpenAFS might have that would be > better. > i am not sure if this is right, but i have heard that coda is a fork of afs, and i tried coda, but got confused that you had a dir only, which you could share, maybe afs is like that too, but i am not sure, nfs just works perfect for me! :D i hope you get it running good! > Thanks. > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:38:02 +0100 > Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >i would say you should try nfs, it supports encryption > >too, and nfs is > >REALLY easy to use- > > > >On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 18:37, brett holcomb wrote: > >> I'm currently using samba to share drives between > >>windows > >> and linux systems. Works okay for the windows systems > >>to > >> see the Linux drives. However, to share between Linux > >> sysetms I need something else. I am considering NFS and > >> noticed Gentoo has OpenAFS also. What are the > >>advantages > >> and disadvantages of each. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > >-- > >Regards, Redeeman > >() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > >/\ - against microsoft attachments > > > > > > > >-- > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
