-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 14 December 2003 07:41 pm, Tom Hosiawa wrote:
> From what I've read, it's not a good idea to use async with nfs for
> mounting /usr/portage because file corruption could happen with multiple
> clients doing emerge sync.
Well.. If your doing this in the first place. Your not really benefiting from
the idea anyway.. The idea is to only rsync with one server and all the
others just read it. Why in the hell would you rsync from more then on
server?
> So I'm thinking, is there anything wrong with having /usr/portage
> ro,async and havin distfile and packages rw,sync (ofcourse no longer as
> a subdirectory of /usr/portage)?
This is actually the idea behind it.
- --
Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/3m3dld4MRA3gEwYRAmB0AKDor5eV9oSDMnk3Ash7/h7+kFCi2wCgogMw
czkvWNmpFetX3ycUVaX3owk=
=0nlE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
