Okay. I haven't been there but have been thinking about it <G>. I tried to check out openmosix but the kernel version they support doesn't have XFS built in so I have to wait until they decide to support 2.4.23 which does have XFS - in short: I gave up on openmosix for a while.
You say it doesn't work and mention the bugs - can you tell me more before I try it. Thanks. On Tuesday 23 December 2003 21:59, you wrote: > been there, done that ... > > OpenMosix is actually severely limited in the real world. Even with the > shared mem patch (I am not sure if the gentoo emerge adds this) it wont > work with mysql. And there's the fact that the current 2.4.23 is very > unstable oM probs), and the pipe bug, and ... > > > Large databases must be able to loadshare somehow. > > BillK > > On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 11:01, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > > You might check out openmosix - it's in portage. > > > > On Tuesday 23 December 2003 21:27, you wrote: > > > I run a mysql database on a relatively low powered gateway (cyrix233) > > > and find that the athlon I ran it on before was far faster (of > > > course!). Is there a way to loadshare using mysql so that when the > > > athlon is up, it takes the load, and the gateway otherwise? > > > > > > I guess some kind of replication and and load distribution overlay is > > > required. I am sure that this has been solved elsewhere, but how? > > > > > > BillK > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
