On Saturday 27 December 2003 07:28, Tom Wesley wrote: > On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 16:15, Collins wrote: > > On Saturday 27 December 2003 07:08, Tom Wesley wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Just wondering on the general policy for replying to emails from this > > > list. I have a tendency to hit the reply and let the email headers > > > dictate where the mail goes. > > > My point is that should the Gentoo list itself remove extra reply-to's > > > and add one to ensure that the replies get sent to the list and not to > > > personal mailboxes? > > > > Read up on this in the archives - discussed ad nauseam. Any decent > > mailer (kmail, evolution, and sylpheed for sure) can reply automatically > > to the list rather than the original sender. > > I know that I *can* reply to the list - but surely if list policy is > that I *should* then the list should enforce that by removing other > reply-to's?
This is a dead end street - as I said discussed ad nauseam. Look up the references in the archives. If gentoo removed the other reply-to's, then you would have no way of replying to the sender. -- Collins -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
