On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:18:53PM +0100, Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> yes, maybe it sounds funny, but I am sure, that micro$hit
> will never start to produce serious secure systems.
>
> There are a lot of reasons for it, but here are the most of them:
>
> 1. They know "stupid man mentality" so they know how to manipulate
> with people ...
> therefore they are not worried to deliver systems,
> which are totally unsave and with thousands of bugs,
> because they (always) know howto convince people
> the new version is super etc.
>
> Stupid man do not like to know about anything what's
> behind the screen... just how it looks like (and how many
> games they can play) is important.
>
> Another example of companies which profits from "stupid man
> mentality" are cigarette co.'s, Coca & Pepsi cola, drug dealers,
> arsenal and even food industry etc.
>
>
> 2. They know, if they make very serious stable system, people will
> be happy & they haven't the need (not forced) to upgrade
>
> (Look to the past: Solingen was known to produce super knifes,
> but the market was very small ... because people were
> buying only one-two knives in all the life !)
Upgrading is the gold mine! Therefore old M$ is not compatible
with new one - to force all users to pay again and again.
>
>
>
> 3. They learned, that to invest into advertising (or BSA panic)
> is more effective in turnover than investment into development.
>
> And due to weak US laws it's possible to declare, they are
> investing 3 milliards USD pro year into development :-o, but
> 99% of this amounght is in real invested into publicity
> and corruption.
> I am sure in case they really invest these many to developement
> they can have absolutely new TOP (unix) system every year, but
> Solingen history can repeat and the process will stop.
>
>
> 4. All the windblowz conception must be changed completely
> because it's really shit.
> It's impossible to have installed more versions of the same DLL.
> There are undocumented API (maybe only the author knows
> about them & howto use it)
> Features of OOP are not used - therefore error messages
> are deceived etc.
> There is very big programmers fluctuation, because really
> good programmers do not like to work for them (it's the
> same like Trabi races for Michael Schumacher).
>
> 5. They are able to corrupt people even in govermets,
> (and they do it very often) since M$ turnover
> is much higher then i.e. Slovak country has.
>
>
> So I think the only way for the future is to stop them
> by law in parliaments or in UNESCO.
>
> There are some very nice successes - SUN's contract with
> China, Australia ...
>
> Don't forget about Munic (4u known as Munchen :-))
> where micro$hit failed to sale their crap too (SuSE wins).
>
> Linux community is doing nice job, but it can
> hardly fight with corruption.
>
> noro
>
>
>
>
> Thomas Preissler wrote:
> >Hello Norbert,
> >>>
> >>>Over 50 % (size related) of my incoming mail traffic
> >>>is that micro$hit related crap.
> >>>
> >>>I was thinking about the best solution to stop it.
> >>>Spam filtering is not a solution, because only hiddens it,
> >>>but it steals traffic anyway.
> >>>
> >>>In the rest I found it ...
> >>>
> >>>micro$hit must be prohibited by law in all over the world !
> >
> >
> >That's funny. And how do you do this? I think, that's not possible.
> >
> >If you wonna discuss this privatly with me, please answer me
> >directly, not via the list; I think this topic is slightly OT...
> >
> >
> >Greets,
> >Tom
>
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
Upgrading is the gold mine! Therefore old M$ is not compatible
with new one - to force all users to pay again and again.
you are rigth. Upgrading is gold mine.
A lot of linux distribution makes the same. The are trying to catch as many users as
possible with the promise the linux is better. Once they are coutght they need help to
make linux running fairly and so they spent money.
How is it possible that linux distribution companies make money by selling open-source
software?
It quite simple. They are trying to convert microsoft licence software cost into
consulence.
So they need to spread. Spreading is a gold mine.
I will never say that microsoft products are bad, or i will never call microsoft
microshit. I can choose the os i prefer, and i prefer linux because it's a UNIX OS.
I don't even want spend time to tell ppl that linux is better that windows.
Why should i do it?
I don't even care about linux spreading.
Why should i do?
i think they can choose as i did.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
