I'm setting up a new machine from stage1. I would get this anyway, wouldn't I?
Can I avoid it somehow? Regards, Goran Na 1074581945, 2004-01-20 ob 07:59, je Jens Mayer napisal(a): > * On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:43:35 +0100, Spider wrote: > > > fun thing is, nptl will -not- work on "x86" only on ~x86 due to > > dependencies. Known fact and not a bug. > > NPTL used to work with "x86" glibc/gcc, so a few people like me > have given it a chance. From my experience, the only problem I > had was smbmout freezing from time to time (which seems to be > a known bug with NPTL 0.28, refering to some Red Hat bugreport > I found aksing google). > > I can not remember that I had to emerge some "~x86" packages due > to get NPTL to run. > > Having to drop NPTL for continuing "x86" seems to have caused > a lot of trouble for some people, and moving to "~x86" to be able to > use NPTL is not really painless, neither. > > I'm a bit at a loss what's the better solution for me at the moment. > > Regards, > Jens -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
