On Wednesday 28 January 2004 05:32, lukas wrote: > On Wednesday 28 January 2004 05:03, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > It would seem that pgp.mit.edu and keyserver.net do not > > communicatie ... and frankly, that surprises me alot. Any idea why > > they do not? These are two major servers! > > That's very strange indeed. [...] > I'll write a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I'm afraid it will > be useless.
So I've wrote a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and today I got this answer from pgp.mit.edu: ------------------------------------------ Hi, > I don't know if you are the right contact persons for my concern but your > addresses are the only ones available on www.keyserver.net and pgp.mit.edu. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct address for pgp.mit.edu > I've noticed that there are no updates between keyserver.net and > pgp.mit.edu which is strange, because both servers are major-servers. > I don't know if this failure (if it is one) is caused by keyserver.net or > by pgp.mit.edu, so I send this mail to both sites. > > These "update failure" causes some confusion on several mailing-lists > and so I hope that you can inform me about the reason. The last time I tried, which was admitedly a while ago, I was unable to get in touch with anyone associated with keyserver.net in order to set up a link between the two keyservers. If anyone at keyserver.net is reading this and can direct me to the right person, please let me know. ------------------------------------------ (n.b. The mail was also addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) So it might be better to use pgp.mit.edu instead of keyserver.net because their service seems to be broken. cu lukas -- ** PGP-key available on keyserver pgp.mit.edu ** Please don't sign your public mail unless your PGP-key is available for everyone!
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
