On Thursday 29 January 2004 03:48, Nicholas Hockey wrote: > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 21:32, lukas wrote: > > On Thursday 29 January 2004 03:09, Phil Barnett wrote: > > > level to use something like Carnivore or it's equivalent. As far > > > as I know, states do not have the power to monitor interstate > > > electronic traffic. > > > > I won't make a bet about that. ;) > > > > cu > > > > lukas > > neither would i, beacuse of the "Patriot Act" passed not long after > the sept. 11 happening, it has been denied several times by congress, > and finaly passed while congress was blinded by the happenings. This > "Act" is a pile of dog *beep* as far as i'm concerned, it basicly > allows the goverment, local or national, to monitor anything you say > or do in your house without the authorization of a judge. > http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html
I know about that and IMHO you are right, but this discussion leads probably to a point that is OT (even though it's become more interesting now :) Maybe it's better to discuss this not on this list. ;) cu lukas -- ** PGP-key available on keyserver pgp.mit.edu ** Please don't sign your public mail unless your PGP-key is available for everyone!
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
