On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:40:58AM -0500, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrey Kartashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VIM is a bit hard to learn, but it's well worth it. So is emacs by the way. > IMHO it's nice to know one of these two, it probably doesn't even matter which > one, mostly depends on your taste and style. Try both, pick one you like better > and learn it well, I don't think you'll ever regret it. VI and Emacs are too common to ignore. Their interface components, such as keymapping, influence nearly every interface design decision in the *nix world. Creeping tentacles from the Windows world excluded, of course. It would almost pay to become familiar with both.
I tried both and chose VI (VIM, really). It may speak on my sanity, but I find the interface to be intuitive. my .02 <currency unit>s -- Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. --Ghost in the Shell
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
