On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > It's quite often broken. particularly if you use old stages. You're far > less likely to get compile errors if you bootstrap as arch and then > update to ~arch once you have an up-to-date system. This is especially > the case on non-x86, where we don't have enough people to make sure that > doing screwy things works :)
I certaintly meant to do that, but as usual I was getting ahead of myself. It completed the bootstrap with no problems, and is now on package 10 of 69 of the base system. I've gotten this far, so I'll probably make it.. if its gonna fail, it usually does during the bootstrap. Thanks again, Aaron -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
